Using Endowments to Educate, Not Accumulate
University endowments’ tax-free status should not be used just to build up wealth.
University endowments’ tax-free status should not be used just to build up wealth.
Don’t Make a Political Issue out of College Endowment Spending
Should colleges be required to pay out a percentage of their endowments?
The UNC Tomorrow Commision’s final report lacks focus.
Trustees were nearly eliminated from the appeals process for fired professors.
Putting the responsibility for training teachers into hands more practical than the hands of education theorists.
Editor’s note: Jon Sanders compiles an annual “Top Ten” list of what he calls the “nuttiest campus events” in North Carolina. This year’s list makes a notable exception, granting the top spot (see below) to something that didn’t happen. What didn’t happen, he says, was so strikingly necessary that its predictable non-occurrence warrants attention.
Onward to this year’s list:
From politically-indoctrinating professors to innovative educational programs, 2007 had it all.
In 1982, the Supreme Court decided that K-12 education could not be denied to illegal immigrants. Symbolically speaking, these children have now grown up and, twenty-five years later, the issue is whether illegal immigrants should be denied a college education at public community colleges and universities.
My view is that individuals who live in the United States, even though illegally, should be allowed to attend college if they pay the full cost of their education.
Illegal immigration is an emotionally wrenching issue because most Americans believe two things that currently contradict one another. They believe that our laws should be obeyed. Yet they recognize that today’s tight immigration laws fly in the face of a major reality: millions of people live in nearby countries whose governments have ruined their economies, making their citizens desperate to leave.
Should the UNC system enroll illegal immigrants?