There Was No Golden Age
American colleges have always had substantial dropout rates, so should we worry?
American colleges have always had substantial dropout rates, so should we worry?
The North Carolina Cooperative Extension has strayed from its original agricultural mission.
Thinking about an intellectually stimulating sabbatical? Consider the James Madison Program at Princeton.
When strolling through the campus of UNC-Chapel Hill, one never ventures far before hearing the buzzwords that typify a large, left-leaning public university.
Hundreds of do-good student activists promote “awareness” about a multitude of issues or campaigns. Others relentlessly seek to foster “dialogue” but when engaged by opposing points of view, quickly resort to the ad hominem attacks of “racism” or “xenophobia.” And nearly everyone—students and faculty members alike—has a particular demographic group it wishes to “empower” over others.
The word you hear most often from campus activists, however, is “diversity.” Racial diversity, ethnic diversity, gender diversity, and even diversity of sexual orientation are all embraced and obsessed over on college campuses. UNC’s fetish over these superficial forms of diversity blocks out concern over intellectual diversity, which should be the primary mission of any institution of higher education.
You never know what you will learn at the annual meeting of the Association for Core Texts and Courses.
Can universities do anything about professors and programs that make a mockery of the subject they are supposed to be teaching?
A degree program in “Social and Economic Justice” at UNC-Chapel Hill reveals the stark contrast between indoctrination and true education.
Tom Tancredo successfully returned to Chapel Hill in spite of the protesters who disrupted his appearance last year.
Policymakers today commonly assume that investing taxpayers’ funds into higher education leads to major payoffs in economic growth. This report looks at broader economic studies that attempts to correlate expenditures with results.
A Supreme Court case tests whether public universities can exclude student groups that restrict membership to those who share their beliefs.