An End to Excellence: How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Undermine Our Medical Schools

An End to Excellence: How Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Undermine Our Medical Schools presents a detailed examination of how Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in American medical schools compromise academic standards, undermine merit-based admissions and hiring, and jeopardize public health outcomes. Focusing on the top ten U.S. medical schools, it documents widespread ideological conformity, racial preferences, and political indoctrination. Despite recent legal and political setbacks to DEI, including the 2023 Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) Supreme Court rulings and federal executive actions, many institutions continue to circumvent merit-based standards in pursuit of demographic diversity.

Key Findings

• DEI is Entrenched Across Top Institutions: All ten of the top-ranked U.S. medical schools maintain offices, mission statements, and/or policies devoted to DEI. These include explicit goals to diversify faculty and student bodies by race and identity, often at the expense of traditional academic metrics.
• Merit is Undermined in Admissions: Schools routinely admit applicants with significantly lower GPAs and MCAT scores based on race or identity while rejecting more qualified white and Asian candidates.
• Curriculum and Faculty Politicization: DEI ideology is embedded in medical curricula, often displacing core scientific content. Faculty are increasingly hired for ideological alignment rather than academic merit, and some institutions now require “anti-racism” training and loyalty statements to progressive causes.
• Persistent Defiance of Legal Rulings: Many medical schools appear to be evading both the spirit and letter of the Supreme Court’s Students for Fair Admissions decision.

Policy Recommendations

The report offers concrete, actionable reforms for state legislators and university trustees:

1. Eliminate All DEI Policies in Medical Schools: DEI practices are discriminatory and should be explicitly prohibited by state statute or university policy.
2. Mandate Use of Objective Admissions Criteria: Require all applicants to submit MCAT scores and discontinue the use of “life experience” or “diversity” essays as a primary selection factor.
   
3. Enforce Transparency: Publicly report demographic and academic data on admissions, faculty hiring, program completion, failure rates, and committee composition.
4. Institute Race-Blind Admissions Protocols: Conceal identifying information, such as names and demographic data, during admissions reviews to mitigate bias.
5. Create Oversight Mechanisms: Establish trustee subcommittees or independent bodies tasked with auditing DEI compliance and enforcing race-neutral admissions.
6. Monitor Internal Communications and Materials: Regularly review medical school websites, handbooks, and training materials to identify and eliminate lingering DEI ideology.
7. Screen Administrative Hires for Ideological Bias: Use hiring interviews to assess whether candidates for senior roles support the return to meritocracy.

DEI in medical education compromises both fairness and competence. To restore trust and quality in medical education, state leaders and university trustees must act decisively to dismantle DEI infrastructures, enforce race-neutral standards, and reestablish the principle of merit as the foundation of medical training.

Downloads

AnEndToExcellence_FINAL