New Kid on the College Rankings Block
A new college ranking system featured in Forbes Magazine might improve on U.S. News’ annual rankings, but neither is necessary.
A new college ranking system featured in Forbes Magazine might improve on U.S. News’ annual rankings, but neither is necessary.
A transfer student discovers that a major university with a national reputation is less rigorous than a small local women’s college.
University education schools have lots of room for improvement when training teachers to teach math.
The lure of financial gains from patented research is causing major changes to academia.
Some doubts about a recent study suggesting that part-time faculty fail to “connect” with students.
A provision in the pending Higher Education Act enables Washington to punish states for cutting aid to higher education.
You can attend your school of choice even if rejected with a little ingenuity.
Students should have complete and accurate information about college courses during registration.
A new report from the Pope Center proposes a way to improve the transparency and accountability of colleges and universities. “Opening Up the Classroom: Greater Transparency through Better, More Accessible Course Information,“ by Jay Schalin, recommends that faculty be required to post their course syllabi—the descriptions that go beyond the sketchy catalog summaries—on the Internet, with access open to the public.
There are four reasons for posting such documents on the Web. These are: to aid students as they register for courses, to expose a professor’s deviation from normal expectations or acceptable academic standards, to aid in pedagogical research and information sharing, and to make comparisons between classes at different universities easier for the determination of transfer credits.
Four distinguished economists discuss the trade-offs between higher education’s two main missions.