Trivializing Law School
A course in writing can’t make up for law schools’ purging of essential legal doctrine.
A course in writing can’t make up for law schools’ purging of essential legal doctrine.
Do universities provide a level playing field for students with learning disabilities, or permit some to game the system?
A professor of English takes issue with Jay Schalin’s article, “Myths of the Ivory Tower.”
The author gets in the final word about his article, “Myths of the Ivory Tower.”
Universities are providing extra time on tests, quiet exam rooms, in-class note-takers, and other assistance to college students with modest learning disabilities. But these policies are shrouded in secrecy. This paper, “Accommodating College Students with Learning Disabilities: ADD, ADHD, and Dyslexia,” by Melana Zyla Vickers, examines the nature of this assistance and discusses the policy questions it raises.
Remedial students who didn’t learn third grade grammar in twelve years aren’t likely to learn it in half a year.
Our higher education system is not going to be this way forever.
Billions of federal dollars send too many unprepared students to college and distort scientific priorities.
A UNC-Chapel Hill program wastes money pushing an ideological trinket.
The “Anything But Knowledge” philosophy of education schools reveals itself in comments on test tampering.